|
May 1,
2007, Vol.6, No.9.
Vengeance
(Part 2)
Keith Sharp
When a Christian suffers wrong, he should not "vow to get
even" or seethe in resentment. He should do good to the evil-doer and leave
vengeance to the Lord (Romans 12:17-21). God has at least three means of
accomplishing this vengeance. He has authorized the punitive power of civil
government, which involves the police officer (Romans 13:3-4). Christ Himself,
as God in ancient days, still "rules in the kingdom of men, and gives it to
whomever he will" (Daniel 4:17; Revelation 19:15), and this involves the
use of armed forces. God will reap final and complete vengeance in the last
judgement of all men (Revelation 20:11-15).
The Master used four examples to illustrate this principle. Each teaches that
we should not seek personal vengeance.
The Lord commanded, "But whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the
other to him also" (Matthew 5:39). The term translated "slaps"
means "strike with the open hand, esp. in the face, slap"
(Arndt & Gingrich. 741). This harmonizes with the fact that a right
handed person would hit another person on the right cheek by slapping him with
the back of the hand.
In all ages, a "slap on the face" has been regarded as the grossest
of insults, but it does not imperil one’s life (cf. 1 Kings 22:24;
Lamentations 3:30; John 19:3; 2 Corinthians 11:20). The illustration is simple
and demanding. When wicked people heap upon us the lowest and meanest insults,
we must not retaliate in kind. Any loyal Christian has been called all sorts of
demeaning names, has endured ostracism, and has been the object of vicious lies.
One must never angrily turn on such an attacker as a dog on its tormentor. When
Jesus was so stricken, he rebuked the offender, but refused to retaliate,
although all the forces of heaven were available to Him by prayer (John 18:22-
23). He is our perfect example of enduring suffering without retaliation (1
Peter 2:18-24).
The Lord demanded, "If anyone wants to sue you and take away your tunic,
let him have your cloak also" (verse 40). The "tunic" denoted
"the inner vest or under garment" (Vine. 1:198). Even the poorest of
Jews would usually have a change of tunics (Barclay, Ibid). But the
"cloak" was "an outer garment, a mantle" (Vine, Ibid) and
consisted of "a large square piece of cloth, provided with tassels"
which "was thrown over the left shoulder and brought over under the right
arm" (Davis. 148). The Jew would usually possess only one such
garment and used it both as a robe by day and a blanket by night (Barclay,
Ibid). The law forbade keeping this cloak as a pledge for debt overnight (Exodus
22:26-27; Deuteronomy 24:12-13).
This is a case of judicial injustice. It does not forbid the Christian’s
use of the court in self defense, as the apostle Paul so employed it. It does
teach that, even should one use the courts to persecute us, we should not seek
vengeance. Be rather willing to lose that which by right cannot be taken from
you than to seek personal vengeance (cf. 1 Corinthians 6:7).
The Master enjoined, "And whoever compels you to go one mile, go with
him two"(verse 41). "Compel" means "to impress into
service" (Vine 1:219) and was applied to the forced transport of military
baggage by the inhabitants of a country through which troops were passing . . .
. The sense of oppression is involved, subjection to arbitrary military power (EGT).
Palestine was an occupied country. At any moment a Jew might feel the touch
of the flat of a Roman spear on his shoulder, and know that he was compelled to
serve the Romans, it might be in the most menial way (Barclay, Ibid).
The Romans had erected "mile posts," markers at intervals of one
mile, and a Jew could be compelled to carry a load for a hated soldier in this
occupying army for one mile, but no more. Jesus taught Jews seething in anger
under this hated, foreign power to do more than they require; carry their burden
two miles.
This is a case of government oppression, subjection to arbitrary military
power. The Roman yoke, starkly obvious when one was compelled to carry out
belittling tasks, was especially galling to the proud Jews, who hated their
masters and yearned for freedom. How exceedingly unsavory must Simon of Cyrene’s
work have seemed, when he was "compelled to bear" the cross of Jesus
(Matthew 27:32; Mark 15:21; Luke 23:26). How easy it would be to allow an
attitude of bitter resentment to spring up and to seek revenge, as the Zealots
did. How tempting it would be to see just how little one could get by with in
serving such a master. But the Christian is to submit to arbitrary, even
tyrannical power, with cheerfulness. Rather than seeing how little we can
cooperate and still get by, we should exceed the demands (1 Peter 2:18-20).
Jesus commanded, "Give to him who asks you, and from him who wants to
borrow from you do not turn away" (verse 42). Did the Master teach an
unlimited benevolence with our material goods? If so, we would soon be
impoverished, and our families would be begging. People who insist that the Lord’s
demand "not to resist an evil person" is completely unqualified
quickly point out that the context qualifies the statement we are now noticing
and that other passages limit it. If this be so for one, why not for the other?
The Lord himself promised, "If you ask anything in My name, I will do
it" (John 14:14). Yet, he refused to grant Paul’s request (2 Corinthians
11:8- 9) and informed others their prayers were not heard because they asked
through improper motives (James 4:3). Even so here, Jesus teaches an attitude
toward giving which is limited and qualified by the context and by other
passages.
The Old Covenant taught Jews to lend generously to their poor brethren even
if they might not be fully repaid and not to charge them interest (Exodus 22:25;
Deuteronomy 15:7-11). The Master teaches us to give without seeking anything
in return (Luke 6:30; Acts 20:35) and to give to our enemies as well as our
brethren (Matthew 5:43-44; Romans 12:20-21). We must give to the needy
cheerfully, not resentfully.
Other passages do qualify the command. In our giving, we must not neglect the
needs of our own family (1 Timothy 5:8), we must put spiritual matters first
(Acts 6:1-4), we are not to encourage the indolent (2 Thessalonians 3:10-12), we
should not use material assistance as an attraction to unbelievers (John
6:26-27), and we must not give beyond our ability to do so honestly (Acts
5:1-11). But these limitations do not negate the fact that, as disciples of
Christ, we must give willingly and without resentment to those in need.
Our Lord does not demand that we be passive in the face of onslaught and
danger. He does allow us to protect our lives, our family and our property. He
does not forbid us to serve in the military or police forces. But Christ does
command us not to seek personal vengeance for wrongs suffered. We must be
willing to bear the grossest insults, the greatest legal injustice, the most
arbitrary power, and the needs of the poor with neither resentment nor personal
vengeance. The standard is high and difficult, but if we would be partakers of
the righteousness of His kingdom, we must obey.
Works Cited
Arndt, W.F. and F.W. Gingrich, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New
Testament.
Barclay, William, The Gospel of Matthew.
Davis Dictionary of the Bible.
Expositor’s Greek Testament.
Keil, C.F. and Franz Delitzsch. Commentary on the Old Testament (Numbers).
Vine, W.E., An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words.
| The Eastside Church of Christ in Shortsville, New York strives to follow God's word. We are a non-denominational Church that has no written standard of doctrinal authority other than the Bible. |
|